Home Head-and-Neck-Cancer-Service-Delivery-Setting-Telehealth |
|
|
|
|
|
Head & Neck Cancer
Service Delivery
Setting - Telehealth

External Scientific Evidence
|
Evidence-Based Practice Guidelines |
|
No evidence-based practice guidelines were found. |
|
Evidence-Based Systematic Reviews |
|
No evidence-based systematic reviews were found. |
Clinical Expertise/Expert Opinion
| Consensus Guidelines |
|
No consensus guidelines were found. |
Client/Patient/Caregiver Perspectives
|
Assessment of Communication and Swallowing Post-Laryngectomy: A Telerehabilitation Trial
Ward, E., Crombie, J., et al. (2009).
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 15(5), 232-7.
|
Description
This study examines the use of an internet-based telerehabilitation system to assess stoma and voice prosthesis in 10 individuals post head and neck cancer. Satisfaction from clinicians and individuals receiving remote speech-language pathology services is reported.
Conclusions
-
Visualization of stoma, tissue transduction and visualization of voice prosthesis were simultaneously measured in face-to-face and remote settings. Although voice measures did not reach a clinically acceptable level of agreement, the authors found "[b]oth the remote and the face-to-face clinician were in complete agreement regarding recommendations for management of patients" (p. 234).
-
"All patients rated their satisfaction with the remote assessment highly and felt that it was similar to face-to-face assessment" (p. 235).
-
Nine out of 10 indicated that they would utilize telehealth services again and eight out of 10 remarked on the convenience telehealth service delivery provided.
- Ninety percent of participants reported adequate audio and visual quality of remote assessment.
» Access the document
|
Assessment of Communication and Swallowing Function Post Laryngectomy: A Telerehabilitation Trial
Ward, L., White, J., et al. (2007).
Journal of Telemedicine & Telecare, 13(S3), 88-91.
|
Description
This study examines the use of an internet-based telerehabilitation system for the evaluation and treatment of 20 individuals post head and neck cancer. Satisfaction from clinicians and individuals receiving internet-based and face-to-face speech-language pathology services is reported.
Conclusions
-
Patients reported high degrees of satisfaction (100%) with usability of telerehabilitation services.
-
Seventy percent of clinicians were satisfied with level of service provided in telehealth setting.
-
Only thirty-five percent of clinicians were satisfied with audio and visual quality of the system and "only 20% agreed they were able to use the system to assess the patient to the best of their ability'' (p. 91).
- During the online assessment, clinicians reported difficulties with viewing stoma and ill-fitting voice prosthesis due to lack of lighting and web camera focus capabilities.
Use the image below to navigate to other sections of the Head & Neck Cancer evidence map.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|